Final Design Summary & Analysis
The article "This soft robotic gripper can
screw in your light bulbs for you", (2017), a team of engineers at the
University of California, San Diego (USCD), designed and built a soft robotic
grip and its features. The soft robotic gripper can "pick up and
manipulate objects without needing to see them and needing to be trained."
It has three fingers made of pneumatic chambers which, have multiple degrees of
freedom allowing manipulation of the held object. Each finger is covered with a
"smart sensing skin made of silicone rubber" with embedded
"sensors made of conducting carbon nanotubes". The sensing skin
records and detects the nanotubes conductivity changes as the fingers bend. The
data is then processed by the control board, which then creates a 3D model of
the object the gripper is manipulating. As good as UCSD is, there are similar
products with better gripping mechanism and special gripping features like the
FlexShapeGripper developed by Festo with collaboration with students from Oslo
and Akershus University.
One of the differences between UCSD and the
FlexShapeGripper is the gripping mechanism. FlexShapeGripper (Festo, 2017) was
inspired by chameleon’s tongue and designed to pick up objects with the widest
range of shapes. The gripper is made up of two cylinders, one containing
compressed air. The other cylinder containing water and attached with elastic
silicone moulding. When grabbing an object, the air inside the pressurized
chamber will be released through a small opening. Then, causing the silicone
cap to move inwards while wrapping itself in a tight form fit around the
irregular object acting as a suction. When gripping an object, the mechanism
inside FlexShapeGripper is triggered by pneumatically and it is strong enough
to hold an object without additional strength. Despite both grippers are using
compressed air, the FlexShapeGripper has better suction and gripping mechanism
compared to UCSD.
Similarly, there is better gripper like
MultiChoiceGripper developed by Festo with collaboration with students with the
University of Linz (Festo, 2014). One of the differences between the UCSD and
the MulitChoiceGripper is the gripping features. It was inspired by “the human
hand and modeled to the thumb”. The distinct feature of the MultiChoiceGripper
is there are different types of grips, enabling the finger to rotate in a
“parallel or centric” manner. The built-in cylinders are used to change the
gripping manner and locking its gripping position by a mechanical locking
system. Each finger joint is controlled by the pneumatic microcylinder. Each
finger has an individual own drive system, allowing the finger to move
individually using compressed air. The gripper has a T-shaped groove allows it
to be adaptable allowing the finger to be used on another gripper. Therefore,
by comparing with soft robotic gripper, MultiChoiceGripper is at an advantage.
In conclusion, the soft robotic gripper would not
be a better choice compared to another gripper like FlexShapeGripper and
MultiChoiceGripper. It does not have any unique gripper finger features
resembling a chameleon’s tongue or resembling a human’s hand. Even though the
UCSD is using the compressed air as well, but it may not be able to grip firmly
as compared to FlexShapeGripper, or the MultiChoiceGripper have a unique
gripping method. Therefore, in my opinion, there is much better gripper out in
the market which can grip effectively.
References
Festo. (2017, January).
FlexShapeGripper – Gripping modelled on a chameleon’s tongue. Retrieved from https://www.festo.com/net/SupportPortal/Files/367915/Festo_FlexShapeGripper_en.pdf
Festo. (2014, April).
MultiChoiceGripper. Retrieved from https://www.festo.com/net/SupportPortal/Files/333986/Festo_MultiChoiceGripper_en.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment